Home                   Weekly Responses     

Week One - May 14

Exploring A Provincial Curriculum and the "Net Generation"

Norton & Wiburg (1998). Chapter 1: Today's Technological Challenges

Alberta Learning. (2000). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Program of Studies, Kindergarten to Grade 12. [On-line}. Available: http://ednet.edc.gov.ab.ca/technology/


“It does not matter how slowly you go, so long as you do not stop.”

Confucius

The ICT Program of Studies is an exciting initiative to bring about change over the next three years in Alberta schools.  “Foundations for the Atlantic Canada Technology Education Curriculum”, a similar document, still in draft form, will set the stage for schools in the Atlantic Provinces.   Although these programs provide a framework for technology integration and outcome attainment in the school curriculum, I would like to address their lack of awareness over the characteristics in implementing change in a system.

These programs were designed to initiate changes in the way the provinces schools address technology.  They do not, however, attend to how they will help reluctant teachers to adapt to and use this new program of studies.

According to Caine and Caine (1997), “With all the action and calls for reform, schools and the education system are notoriety resistant to change.  Although theorists and educators have collectively amassed an enormous amount of research on good teaching and on learning, our schools remain largely the same”.  As educators, we need to consider this dynamic, the resistance to change.   Accommodations must be built into such programs to ensure that transitions are made smoother and will, in fact, occur.

As our discussion Monday night reflected, a lack of teacher training with such programs often result in a lack of implementation.   The fear of the unknown and a reluctance to adapt to new skills may lead to the failure of such a programs.

There is enormous teacher burnout, and yet much more is being demanded of teachers."   

Caine & Caine

 

I would also like to address the question of why Alberta, and other provinces have taken such a strong stance with new programs such as these.  Just last week at a staff meeting, we were given a quiz about topics we had all learned in school.  These were questions we could all remember studying and felt sure we know.  The results were dismal!

This activity was meant to demonstrate that the attainment of facts rarely affects long-term learning.  Considering the immense amount of information available today, it would be impossible and fruitless to attempt to present numerous facts to students as part of the curriculum of the future.  We must provide students with the skills to manipulate and manage the overload of information for themselves.  We must help them to become life-long learners.

I believe that a strong stance must be taken in implementing change in order to monitor the transition to life-long learning.  How do we decide what information is critical to the students as opposed to that which is not?  What skills are necessary for students to survive in the technological world?  Such programs must be in place to monitor changes lest we get to the point where students are accessing curriculum all on their own with little or no input, supervision, or monitoring.

 

Sources

Caine, R.N. & Caine, G. (1997). Education on the edge of possibility.  Alexandria, VA: ASCD

Home                   Weekly Responses